英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

absorbable    
a. 可吸收的,容易被吸收的

可吸收的,容易被吸收的

absorbable
adj 1: capable of being absorbed or taken in through the pores
of a surface [ant: {adsorbable}, {adsorbate}]

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia
    On appeal, the Ohio First District Court of Appeal affirmed Brandenburg's conviction, rejecting his claim that the statute violated his First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment right to freedom of speech
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio | Oyez
    Question Did Ohio's criminal syndicalism law, prohibiting public speech that advocates various illegal activities, violate Brandenburg's right to free speech as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments?
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio and the Imminent Lawless Action Test
    In its 1969 decision in Brandenburg v Ohio, the U S Supreme Court established the “imminent lawless action” test This ruling redefined the constitutional limits on free speech, creating a standard for when inflammatory language loses its First Amendment protection
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio: The Ultimate Guide to Free Speech and Incitement
    For decades, this question plagued American courts, leading to confusing and often contradictory rulings that could land people in jail simply for having unpopular ideas Then, in 1969, a case involving a Ku Klux Klan leader in rural Ohio changed everything
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969): Defining and Arguing Hate Speech
    So what question is the Supreme Court answering in this case? Whether the Ohio Syndicalism law is constitutional, or whether it violates Brandenburg’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights (p 444) The First Amendment issue is straightforward – he was sentenced to jail and fined for his speech
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio | Constitution Center
    In a per curiam opinion (meaning one written “by the court as a whole”), the Supreme Court reversed Brandenburg’s conviction and struck down the Ohio law
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio: Honors US Government Study Guide |. . .
    By prioritizing individual rights and limiting government interference in personal expression, it paved the way for subsequent rulings that further define and protect free speech, reflecting an ongoing dialogue about balancing safety and liberty within a democratic society
  • Ohio Law And Brandenburg V. Ohio: Understanding Free Speech Limits
    Brandenburg’s challenge to Ohio’s law not only vindicated his rights but also strengthened the nation’s commitment to safeguarding open and robust public discourse
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio - Rochester Institute of Technology
    Ohio remains the controlling precedent in regard to illegal advocacy Its “imminent lawless action” test sets a highly protective standard for speech right up to the very brink of lawless danger
  • BRANDENBURG v. OHIO - The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression
    Brandenburg challenged the constitutionality of the criminal syndicalism statute under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, but the intermediate appellate court of Ohio affirmed his conviction without opinion





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009