英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

gamely    音标拼音: [g'emli]
ad. 雄赳赳地,兴致勃勃地

雄赳赳地,兴致勃勃地

gamely
adv 1: in a plucky manner; "he was seen by a shepherd, gamely
negotiating a particularly tricky section of the mountain
road to San Doloroso"

Gamely \Game"ly\, adv.
In a plucky manner; spiritedly.
[1913 Webster]


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
gamely查看　gamely　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
gamely查看　gamely　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
gamely查看　gamely　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • In C# what is the difference between ToUpper() and ToUpperInvariant()?
    In C#, what is the difference between ToUpper() and ToUpperInvariant()? Can you give an example where the results might be different?
  • What is difference between ToUpperInvariant() and ToUpper(new . . .
    ToUpper() is the same as ToUpper(CultureInfo CurrentCulture), whereas ToUpperInvariant() is the same as ToUpper(CultureInfo InvariantCulture), the comments hint that you already figured that out So of course there is a difference here - CultureInfo InvariantCulture should only be used when not interacting with humans (parsers etc), as it gives a consistent result, whereas ToUpper(CultureInfo
  • Normalization of Strings With String. ToUpperInvariant ()
    If I move to using ToUpperInvariant for string normalization, I will have to change my database schema as well, since my schema is based on Microsoft's ASP NET Membership framework (see this related question), which normalizes strings to lower case
  • Why is ToUpperInvariant () faster than ToLowerInvariant ()?
    I read in CLR via C# by Jeffrey Richter that String ToUpperInvariant() is faster than String ToLowerInvariant() He says that this is because the FCL uses ToUpperInvariant to normalise strings, so the method is ultra-optimised
  • c# - What is wrong with ToLowerInvariant ()? - Stack Overflow
    Besides what TomTom says, net is optimized for string comparison in upper case So using upper invariant is theoretically faster than lowerinvariant This is indeed stated in CLR via C# as pointed out in the comments Im not sure if this is of course really true since there is nothing to be found on MSDN about this topic The string comparison guide on msdn mentions that toupperinvariant and
  • ¿Qué diferencia existe entre ToUpper () y ToUpperInvariant ()?, en C#
    ToUpperInvariant(): Usa lo que se podría llamar una cultura neutra para determinar las reglas para convertir una cadena a mayúsculas En la práctica, para la gran mayoría de las letras que usamos comúnmente en inglés o español, en realidad no hay diferencia entre los 2 métodos
  • string - Upper vs Lower Case - Stack Overflow
    Use the String ToUpperInvariant method instead of the String ToLowerInvariant method when you normalize strings for comparison Why? From Microsoft: Normalize strings to uppercase There is a small group of characters that when converted to lowercase cannot make a round trip What is example of such a character that cannot make a round trip?
  • ToUpperInvariant () – is MSDN wrong on its recommendation?
    But in article on String ToUpperInvariant() there is different recommendation: (Statement B ) If you need the lowercase or uppercase version of an operating system identifier, such as a file name, named pipe, or registry key, use the ToLowerInvariant or ToUpperInvariant methods
  • C#: better way than to combine StartsWith and two ToUpperInvariant . . .
    C#: better way than to combine StartsWith and two ToUpperInvariant calls Asked 14 years, 2 months ago Modified 6 years, 11 months ago Viewed 886 times
  • string. ToLower () and string. ToLowerInvariant () - Stack Overflow
    What's the difference and when to use what? What's the risk if I always use ToLower() and what's the risk if I always use ToLowerInvariant()?





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009